Recession? How about depression? Jobless claims are on the rise!

There is no doubt in my mind that this moment in time will go down in history as being profoundly life-altering, and I wonder in 50 years who will be listed to blame for this economic madness? I also wonder if this will actually be termed a recession, or perhaps a second depression. I have maintained for some time that the only reason we are not seeing the long labor lines, is because job hunting is not done that way anymore. Talk to those who are in human resource, or better yet employment agencies, who are getting on the average between 300-500 hits per ad they run for one job. If those people were standing in lines, they would go all around a building, just like they did during the Great Depression.

So, it seems the saga continues with this recent rise in unemployment claims for benefits, and the already 471,000 filed unemployment claims are up by 25,000 in just one week. Is it any wonder Jennifer Lee’s response at senior economist at BMO Capital Markets says, “Although no one expects this volatile series to go in one direction every single week, this is clearly a disappointment.”

A disappointment is the understatement.

Read More:

To spend or not to spend, that is the question: Senators debate unemployment extensions

The fact that new reports show that nearly the 3.4 million Americans who have been unemployed for more than a year is alarming, but even more jolting is that 23 per cent record high has not existed since after World War I.

The timing for this recent report given by the Pew Economic Policy Group (PEPG) is perfect, especially with the current debates in Congress over extending unemployment benefits past the original 26 week commitment to new temporary maximum of 99 weeks.

While extended benefits for the jobless might be an exciting thought, the lawmakers in Congress are divided. Even though joblessness and unemployment looms over America in alarming numbers, there is also a huge concern with the some $87 billion this extension might cost this fiscal year, should the 99-week maximum be extended through the end of September.

Democrats and Republicans continue to argue from different sides of the fence–Democrats looking to the stimulus package as a means to assist with an emergency, while Republicans do not want to see any growth in the federal deficit.

Tom Coburn (R-Okla) put a hold on the bill because it did not offset the $9.2 billion that was spent on the last brief extension, but senators are scheduled to vote on whether Coburn’s objection will hold, or to proceed forward with the bill that will require 60 votes.

Read More:

The UN-Benefits of Unemployment

More and more it is evident that something is amiss with our so-called unemployment benefits. Stories like the one posted here are becoming commonplace. Then there are all those being denied benefits, when they worked for years putting into the pot to collect, and the question continues to arise, “why are people who are really unemployed regardless of how much they earn when they are still working not eligible?” Just this week, a man who was laid off a few months ago, decided to go back to school and get his secondary credential so he can teach high school was denied his unemployment benefits because he is now getting federal grant money for school. Say what?

Read More:

Unemployment rates rise in California as Washington announces a Housing Finance Agency Innovation

You may qualify for a Refinance Loan under this program if: (If is the operative word)
· Your loan is owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac
· You’re current on your mortgage payments
· You can demonstrate you can afford the lower payments
· You don’t owe more than 105% of your home’s estimated value

Oh wait, “you can demonstrate you can afford the lower payments?” Given the fact that the unemployment rate in several counties in California alone has topped 20%, the Fannie Mae Refi PlusTM Program might prove to be pointless.

WASHINGTON, DC — Today, the Obama Administration released the next steps in the recently-announced Housing Finance Agency Innovation Fund for the Hardest Hit Housing Markets (“HFA Hardest-Hit Fund”).

On February 19, 2010, President Obama announced additional funding for innovative measures to help families in the states that have been hit the hardest by the aftermath of the burst of the housing bubble. States where house prices have fallen more than 20% from their peak are eligible for this funding. Those states are Nevada, California, Florida, Arizona and Michigan. The HFA Hardest-Hit Fund will help housing finance agencies (“HFAs”) in these states further respond to the most pressing problems in their communities. HFAs have an understanding of the most urgent local challenges and an ability to address them expeditiously. For that reason, the Obama Administration has committed $1.5 billion in funding under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”) to help HFAs expand their assistance to struggling homeowners and innovate new ways to address housing challenges.

Today the Administration released detailed guidance for eligible HFAs to submit program proposals for funding. The HFA Hardest-Hit Fund is designed to allow the maximum possible flexibility to eligible HFAs in designing programs that are tailored to the needs of their state. Today’s guidance provides instruction to HFAs to ensure that program proposals meet basic guidelines and comply with the purposes of EESA. All programs must protect home values, preserve homeownership, promote jobs and economic growth, and provide accountability to the public.

Funding allocations were also released today based on a formula to provide relief in direct proportion to the scale of each state’s housing challenges. Funds have been allocated based on home price declines, unemployment rates, and mortgage delinquencies.

Eligible HFAs may submit program proposals to the Department of the Treasury up to the April 16th deadline, after which the review period will begin. Treasury will provide additional updates to the public as the program progresses.

This is all well and good for the person who can qualify, but here in bankrupt California, we are “still” dealing with a very serious unemployment rate. In fact, according to the Los Angeles times, the unemployment rate became even higher in January, indicating that we are not out of trouble yet, and the so-called “economic recovery” has not loosed more jobs for this Golden State!

As a matter of fact, California joins with Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, reaching an unemployment crescendo since the government began keeping track in 1976, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. California’s was 12.5% in January, up from 12.3% in December.

According to Esmael Adibi, and economist at Chapman University in Orange, California he said, “The unemployment rate will be persistently at this high level for at least a few more months.”

With the latest stats, California is showing a slower recovery, and economists now believe that it is going to take longer to recover from this economic crisis than previously thought.

Adibi said, “The impact on the labor market was much more severe than what we had estimated,” and frankly, this should come as no surprise to those who have lost their jobs, their homes, and become financially compromised here in the Golden State.

Many counties in California are still suffering from the unemployment rate, with some counties like Merced rising to 21.7%, so what is this going to do for those who own homes?

“The real mystery now is why we aren’t getting job growth when the GDP has been positive,” said Stephen Levy, director of the Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy.

Levy further claims that the budget issues in California are only going to drag down the state’s recovery. Levy said, “Even if they don’t get pink slips, state employees are earning less money because of furloughs and salary reductions, which reduces consumer spending in the state.”

One cannot help but wonder where all of this is leading? The long-term effects of this economic crisis is not painting a pretty picture for many in California and other states that have been hard-hit.

Read More:


http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/pr_03052010.html

Government employees are bringin’ home the bacon!

There is an old cowboy saying, “I’m so far behind, I’m lookin’ at the back of my head!” Most Americans have been hit so hard by this recession, they are looking at the back of their heads, wondering if things will ever turn around. However, according to Rich Lowry, a writer for New York Post, “For most Americans, the Great Recession has been an occasion to hold on for dear life. For public employees, it’s been an occasion to let the good times roll.”

That’s right, USA Today reports that there are a number of federal employees actually making over $100,000 a year, and even more astounding is the fact that this percentage rose from 14 percent to 19 percent during the first part of this recession. In 2008 USA Today also claims, “benefits for public employees grew at a rate three times that of private employees.”

In addition, The New York times reports that 110, 000 jobs have been added to the state and local government since the beginning of this economic slide.

Lowry says, “It used to be said that the Great Depression wasn’t so bad, if you had a job. The Great Recession has practically been a boom, if you have a government job.”

Naturally in the midst government financial elation, the general and private sectors continue to suffer with no real relief in site. We won’t even begin to discuss what the teachers in California are going through.

Government and the public-employees unions seem to be creating a bit of economic havoc, while they are bringin’ home the bacon!

We are being lulled into a near coma with Fannie/Freddie illusions of grandeur, while US state and local economies continue to tailspin out of control!!!

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/rolling_in_dough_IEQqExWnRonswRVQZcl3WM#ixzz0enyWOl0U

One year later: Obama still chanting, “change,” and jobs, jobs, jobs are our future!

After Obama’s State of The Union Address what can we expect to see in the housing market in 2010?

A new commitment to fiscal restraint, and the certainty that change is impeding, Obama assured us, that Americans are resilient “ while affirming, “I never suggested change would be easy.” So, “It’s time for something new,” he said… Something that will bring an assurance to American’s about the future. However, just what does that mean?

“The steps we took last year to shore up the housing market have allowed millions of Americans to take out new loans and save an average of $1500 on mortgage payments. This year we will step up refinancing so that homeowners can move into more affordable mortgages.”

With so much talk about “recovery, “how is this going to take place? Just what does Obama mean by “stepping up refinancing so that homeowners can move into “affordable mortgages?”

Obama made it very clear that jobs, jobs, jobs are a central focus for 2010; however, in two months the Treasury Department’s $1.25 trillion program to buy agency mortgage-backed securities will end. This program did drive down mortgage rates and open up the market for some real estate buyers, but how does Obama plan on bringing recovery to the housing market?

While very little was mentioned in Obama’s State of the Union speech about the real estate market, perhaps the President’s focus for creating new jobs will bring a new sense of relief to this troubled housing market, since the boom of foreclosures has been more largely the result of unemployment. While the Administration’s modification and refinance programs have made a small difference for those trying to keep their homes in this pressed economy, these programs will not work if a borrower has no job!

Obviously Obama believes jobs will bring about change, and let’s hope so! If that’s his point of view, great, but he better not use my money to put expensive Band-Aids on cuts that might not heal.

Employment vs. Un-employment: You be the judge!

Employment rate at 90%? I am not buying it. There is UNEMPLOYMENT EVERYWHERE! My question is: “How the heck does the U.S. Department of Labor come up with these kind of stats?” There is something ROTTEN in Denmark people!!!