Stop the leak NOW!

This is a great, heart-felt video made by the Director of Sales and Marketing at Southern California’s Earth Cafe Living Foods.

The BP oil leak needs to be stopped, and STOPPED NOW! Not at the end of summer; not going w/ a 90% Containment Plan (kicks in next mo.).

If you agree with this response, please forward this on, and join the effort to Stop The Leak Now!

Thank you!

Recession? How about depression? Jobless claims are on the rise!

There is no doubt in my mind that this moment in time will go down in history as being profoundly life-altering, and I wonder in 50 years who will be listed to blame for this economic madness? I also wonder if this will actually be termed a recession, or perhaps a second depression. I have maintained for some time that the only reason we are not seeing the long labor lines, is because job hunting is not done that way anymore. Talk to those who are in human resource, or better yet employment agencies, who are getting on the average between 300-500 hits per ad they run for one job. If those people were standing in lines, they would go all around a building, just like they did during the Great Depression.

So, it seems the saga continues with this recent rise in unemployment claims for benefits, and the already 471,000 filed unemployment claims are up by 25,000 in just one week. Is it any wonder Jennifer Lee’s response at senior economist at BMO Capital Markets says, “Although no one expects this volatile series to go in one direction every single week, this is clearly a disappointment.”

A disappointment is the understatement.

Read More:

Come and get it!


Well, it seems the Colonel has done it again! Oh yeah, Kentucky’s singin’ a new kind of bluegrass tune! The “Double-Down-Sandwich, which is in the “trial” stage, is a guaranteed cholesterol joy ride, with clogged arteries on the side. Might need an artery roto rooter after this unhealthy calorie blast, and yeah, it will probably JUST TAKE ONE!

Investors hit hard: High-speed trading glitch disaster

High-Speed Trading Glitch Costs Investors BillionsThe glitch that sent markets tumbling Thursday was years in the making, driven by the rise of computers that transformed stock trading more in the last 20 years than in the previous 200.

Ruth Fremson/The New York Times

Visitors on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange watched monitors on Thursday as the Dow Jones index plunged by hundreds of points within minutes.

The old system of floor traders matching buyers and sellers has been replaced by machines that process trades automatically, speeding the flow of buy and sell orders but also sometimes facilitating the kind of unexplained volatility that roiled markets Thursday.

“We have a market that responds in milliseconds, but the humans monitoring respond in minutes, and unfortunately billions of dollars of damage can occur in the meantime,” said James Angel, a professor of finance at the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University.

In recent years, what is known as high-frequency trading — rapid automated buying and selling — has taken off and now accounts for 50 to 75 percent of daily trading volume. At the same time, new electronic exchanges have taken over much of the volume that used to be handled by the New York Stock Exchange.

In fact, more than 60 percent of trading in stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange takes place on separate computerized exchanges.

Many questions were left unanswered even hours after the end of the trading day. Who or what was the culprit? Why did markets spin out of control so rapidly? What needs to be done to prevent this from happening again?

The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission said they were examining the cause of the unusual trading activity.

Mary L. Schapiro, chairwoman of the S.E.C., and Gary Gensler, the head of the C.F.T.C., held conference calls with overseers of the exchanges who were reviewing trading tapes from the day.

One official said they identified “a huge, anomalous, unexplained surge in selling, it looks like in Chicago,” about 2:45 p.m. The source remained unknown, but that jolt apparently set off trading based on computer algorithms, which in turn rippled across indexes and spiraled out of control.

Many firms have computers that are programmed to automatically place buy or sell orders based on a variety of things that happen in the markets. Some of the simplest triggers are set off when a stock drops or rises a certain percent in the trading day, or when an index moves a specific amount.

But these orders can have a cascading effect. For example, if enough programs place sell orders when the overall market is down, say, 4 percent in a single day, those orders could push the market down even more — and set off programs that do not kick in until the market is down 5 percent, which in turn can have the effect of pushing stocks down even more.

Some circuit breakers do exist, a legacy of the reforms made following the 1987 stock market crash, but they only kick in after a huge drop — and only at certain hours. Before 2 p.m., a 10 percent drop in the Dow causes New York Stock Exchange to halt trading for one hour. Between 2 p.m. and 2:30 p.m., the pause shrinks to a half-hour and after 2:30, there is no halt in trading.

If there is a 20 percent drop, trading stops for two hours before 1 p.m. and by one hour between 1 and 2 p.m. After 2 p.m., the market closes.

Glitches in individual stocks have happened before — what was different Thursday was the scale of the problem. In April 2009, shares of Dendreon, a small biotech company, dived by more than 50 percent in less than two minutes, just before a presentation by Dendreon executives, Mr. Angel said.

Trading was halted on the Nasdaq, where Dendreon is listed, but there was no news as it turned out, Mr. Angel said, and when trading resumed the stock returned to its previous levels. “It took a human two minutes to discover something was wrong and halt trading,” he said.

What happened Thursday was different because it moved hundreds of stocks sharply at the same time, many of them blue chips that form the foundation of individual investors portfolios as well as major indexes like the Dow and the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index.

The near-instantaneous swings left brokers dumbfounded. Dermott W. Clancy, who runs a New York Stock Exchange broker, said Thursday was one of the five worst days he has seen in 24 years in the business. When the market dropped across all indexes in a matter of minutes, customers were calling him nonstop.

“They’re calling saying ‘Is there something I’m missing? Is there somebody valuing these securities at this level? Is there some news in the marketplace I’m not aware of?’ ” he said.

The answer — that it all started with an apparent error — infuriated Mr. Clancy. “The market was never down one thousand points,” he said. “Procter & Gamble should never have traded at $39. But a lot of people lost money as if the prices were meant to drop.”

For a short while, traders started to distrust what they were seeing.

“There was no pricing mechanism,” Mr. Clancy said. “There was nothing. No one knew what anything was worth. You didn’t know where to buy a stock or sell a stock.”

Jackie Calmes and Binyamin Appelbaum in Washington contributed reporting.

IRS provision in health bill: Hazardous to American’s health

Will this proposed health bill compromise American families, and give the IRS even more power than it has today?

Subcommittee on Oversight ranking member Charles Boustany (R-La.) said, “The IRS provision in the bill “dangerously expands, in an ominous way the tentacles of the IRS and it’s reach into every American family,” he said today during a press conference.”

Boustany further claims that the bill would allow the IRS to confiscate refunds if there are penalties for not buying health care.

In addition, taxpayers could be required to buy insurance under President Barack Obama’s reform proposal by 2014 or face penalties of roughly $325 per individual that the IRS would collect.

Worse job market since the Great Depression: A new take on why jobs are hard to find

The San Francisco Chronicle came out with a brief tidbit as to why the job market is so difficult, and the ability to find jobs has offered little success for many. Harvard University economist Richard Freeman looks at a historical perspective globally as an explanation for our current plight.

Read More:

Words fall short: Obama’s promise of transparency run-over by exceptions

While this current administration has promised greater transparency in government, words fall short with the number of deviations where the rule doesn’t apply.

How convenient.

What is the point in making promises, if there is no follow-through, or if these promises are run-over by continuous exceptions to the rule?

Supposedly we the “little” people are in a much more open relationship with this current administration, but secrets and the lack of transparency never make for a good relationship.

Under the Freedom of Information Act exception, also known as the “deliberative process” exemption, the government can withhold records that “describe decision-making behind the scenes,” according to the Associated Press (AP).

In addition, AP says, “The government’s track record under the Freedom of Information Act is widely considered a principal measurement of how transparently it makes decisions. When Obama promised last year to be more open he said doing so “encourages accountability through transparency,” and said: “My administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in government.”

Over one year in office, and we are still waiting, and agree with Obama as he said, “Our work is not done,” as he boasted during Sunshine Week about the wonderful strides this administration has made to ensure a more open and transparent government in reference to the White house release of their visitor logs and federal data online, further stating that his administration was “to be the most open and transparent ever.”

Read More:

Feds on facebook: A call to rethink your buddy list?

If you have nothing to hide, this seems safe enough, but perhaps if you have any hidden agenda’s or secrets that you “only” share with your Facebook friends, you might want to re-think your buddy list.

This new quest that the FEDS are on to fight for justice and the American way, to expose the snake in the grass, or stop criminals from gathering personal information from the “good guys” who have been enjoying social networking as we tweet from face to face, and stay linked-in with one another has been discovered as a result of a document that surfaced in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. The document revealed that federal agents are utilizing social network sites in order to keep tabs on suspects activities as they, “exchange messages with suspects, identify a target’s friends or relatives and browse private information such as postings, personal photographs and video clips.”

While this is excellent for keeping track of those using social networking for devious purposes, is it somewhat invading our privacy?
A former U.S. cybersecurity prosecutor, Marc Zwillinger, said investigators should be able to go undercover in the online world the same way they do in the real world, even if such conduct is barred by a company’s rules. But there have to be limits, he said.

In the face-to-face world, agents can’t impersonate a suspect’s spouse, child, parent or best friend. But online, behind the guise of a social-networking account, they can.

Zwillinger added, “Investigators should be able to go undercover in the online world the same way they do in the real world, even if such conduct is barred by a company’s rules. But there have to be limits. This new situation presents a need for careful oversight so that law enforcement does not use social networking to intrude on some of our most personal relationships,” said Zwillinger, whose firm does legal work for Yahoo and MySpace.”

So, the next time you get a request to be someone’s friend by an unknown, you may want to re-think your buddy list.

Read More:

Recovering but not recovered: Jobless are losing benefits on Sunday

Sunday marks the beginning of the end for some of the jobless who are currently receiving benefits, since the Senate refused to push back the February 28th deadline, leaving many on shaky ground. Ultimately, this could effect 1 million, who are currently receiving unemployment benefits, once they run out of their current state or/and federal benefits. In addition, these numbers may increase to approximately 5 million by June, according to the National Unemployment Law Project.

Read more:

The wonderment continues: Polls and stats create more doubt

Politicians quoting poll numbers? Controversies in the health-care policy? Promises made still have not been kept since Obama has been in office? Surely we can trust these politicians.

Well, it seems the wonderment continues after the White House Health policy conference held today. After a day-long talk-a-thon, we are not any closer to understanding just what Obama plans on doing.